President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Says his Father was not a Dictator

“You possibly can say what you need, that’s your opinion. You’re unsuitable.”

This was Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s response to those that are calling him the son of a dictator. Marcos mentioned this in a pre-recorded video interview together with his goddaughter Toni Gonzaga, a TV actress who additionally hosted election rallies of Marcos throughout the marketing campaign interval. The interview was uploaded on YouTube on September 13 and aired on a brand new TV community owned by a political ally of the president.

It marks the primary time that the president has agreed to a one-on-one interview after his proclamation in Might. It’s telling that the interview was not executed by a member of the press, which displays the president’s refusal to be questioned by journalists he deems biased towards his household.

The interview was launched a number of days earlier than the president’s necessary journey to america, the place he’s scheduled to handle the United Nations Basic Meeting, and every week earlier than the fiftieth anniversary of his father’s declaration of Martial Legislation in 1972. As a substitute of a televised speech or a press discussion board, he selected to debate the state of the nation and his ideas on a number of controversial matters by sitting down for a vlog interview together with his goddaughter.

Regardless of the well-documented abuses dedicated throughout the Martial Legislation years, the president insisted that it’s not correct to name his father, Ferdinand E. Marcos, a dictator as a result of authorities insurance policies and packages throughout that point had been drafted solely after consulting with varied stakeholders. He even claimed that succeeding administrations consulted fewer individuals and teams.

See also  China Stresses Ties With Southeast Asia in Cambodia Assembly

Having fun with this text? Click on right here to subscribe for full entry. Simply $5 a month.

Maybe in anticipation of crucial commentaries forward of the protests which can be set to accompany the Martial Legislation anniversary, Marcos emphasised that army rule was wanted to avoid wasting the republic from the threats of communism and Muslim secessionism.

“You possibly can verify information. Let’s discuss information, not political opinion,” he asserted. However he adopted this up with a false narrative about how the communist rebels got here near gaining management of city facilities in 1972. What he didn’t point out was that the armed wing of the Communist Occasion was established solely in 1969 and this rag-tag military was principally based mostly in distant provinces. It did achieve energy and a nationwide following however solely after Marcos turned an authoritarian chief. He additionally conveniently forgot so as to add that his father’s time period as president would have led to 1973 if Martial Legislation had not been declared.

It isn’t simply the historical past of Martial Legislation that the president wished to revise, as he expressed intent to reopen the courtroom case directing his household to pay an excellent property tax of 23 billion pesos ($403 million {dollars}) which has since gone as much as 203 billion pesos ($3.5 billion {dollars}) due to penalties and surcharges. Marcos mentioned the household was not given an opportunity to correctly argue their case as a result of they had been pressured to enter exile in Hawaii after his father’s ouster in 1986. This has already been fact-checked as false as a result of the courtroom proceedings passed off within the Nineteen Nineties when the Marcoses had been already again within the nation and President Marcos himself was an elected member of the Home of Representatives.

See also  China’s twentieth Occasion Congress: Continuity and Change

Marcos mentioned he intends to speak about financial restoration and meals safety on the U.N. this week. That is ironic since he has lately downplayed the function of worldwide mechanisms to handle pressing social points. Requested about why the Philippines is not going to rejoin the Worldwide Felony Courtroom, which is investigating the drug-related killings dedicated below the earlier Rodrigo Duterte authorities, Marcos mentioned in his interview with Gonzaga that it was pointless.

“The alleged crimes had been all dedicated within the Philippines. They had been all dedicated by Filipinos. Why will we want a foreigner to inform us cope with it? I don’t assume we do. I don’t assume we want…I don’t see why it’s a violation of human rights. It’s a query of jurisdiction and sovereignty,” he mentioned.

This sort of reasoning echoes the rhetoric of different infamous heads of state, who assault the U.N. and its consultants for allegedly meddling of their home affairs.

Regardless of the deceptive assertions, the interview with Marcos yielded essential perception into a few of his coverage priorities. For instance, he mentioned the anti-drug marketing campaign will proceed however below a distinct method focusing primarily on prevention and rehabilitation. He additionally forged doubt on the effectiveness of the demise penalty as a deterrent. He vowed to concentrate on reworking the financial system as he reiterated his marketing campaign promise to carry down the price of meals gadgets, particularly rice, over the subsequent three years.

Close to the top of the interview, Marcos was requested about his dream for the nation. His reply was “equality,” as he famous the extensive hole between the wealthy and poor. Might he ponder extra on his response in order that he can have a broader idea of equality that may make him perceive that equal entry doesn’t simply check with financial items but additionally to justice.

See also  The ‘Taiwan Card’ in US Home Politics